Comparing Aircraft Engine MRO With Non-MRO Sources For Critical Engine Components

Comparing Aircraft Engine MRO With Non-MRO Sources For Critical Engine ComponentsIt should come as no surprise that the field of aviation is one of the most heavily regulated in the world. While there are still some regions where aerial safety issues are more likely than others, on the whole, flying is safer than ever — largely due to these tough regulations.

There are many reasons why so many companies and nations have lined up behind the strictest standards in aviation. For example: In order to ignite economic growth, it’s important national carriers from relatively remote markets be able to promise exceptional safety records.

However, there’s still a diverse array of different players in the aviation industry, and it’s key to realize that not every link in the supply chain may necessarily play by the exact same rules.

One area where this is the case is the question of MRO versus non-MRO sources of aircraft parts.


An MRO Adds Value To Your Search For Aircraft Components From Moment One

When you deal with an MRO like Covington Aircraft, you can rest assured that every aircraft part you purchase — and all of the sub-components that make them work — is in the best condition.

New parts are sourced directly from the manufacturer, and refurbished parts are held to the very highest possible standards. Many of those standards are set by the original manufacturer, though MROs are capable of going “above and beyond.”

When you purchase a car, you want to know everything about its history, previous issues, and functional life. This allows you to estimate its value and what it can do for you.

In such a highly documented field as aviation, you should expect no less from your aircraft parts, even if you are looking at “refurbs.” To get all the details, though, an MRO’s expertise is needed.


When It Comes To MRO Versus Non-MRO, The True Experts Win Hands Down Every Time

Even brands known for “budget conscious” ticketing and fees don’t skimp when it comes to the quality of their crucial aircraft components. When it comes to MRO versus non-MRO components, non-MRO savings is meager and the lack of true expertise can be devastating.

At Covington Aircraft, we understand that it’s important to you to get true ROI for all of your major aircraft investments. We work with fleets just like yours to ensure that our maintenance routines will keep you flying and extend the functional life of your aircrafts.

Non-MRO companies may be able to offer less expensive parts in some cases, but their inability to provide the full spectrum of services means that you your costs will increase in other areas.

For a company that truly is the “total package” in aircraft engines and maintenance, call Covington Aircraft today. We are looking forward to helping you achieve your goals.

One thought on “Comparing Aircraft Engine MRO With Non-MRO Sources For Critical Engine Components

  1. Covington is a very well respected name, so no argument there, but I don’t think the term MRO has any real relevance when it comes to aftermarket aircraft parts. What you need is an approved part as evidenced by the Form One or 8130-3, and you should probably use your own judgement about the documents and their origin as well. The FAA has a procedure for dealing with SUPs (Suspected Unapproved Parts), and clearly the term “suspected” requires the use of judgement.

    In the article you referred to OEM parts and that’s where I tend to agree. As a prior purveyor of OEM parts as opposed to PMA, I prefer them, but then again, I don’t pay the bill.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *